PSA2016: The 25th Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association

Full Program »

Why Grounding does Not Back Scientific Explanation

Abstract: Recently it has been claimed that so-called “grounding” relations, developed in analytic metaphysics, back compositional, or “constitutive mechanistic”, explanations in the sciences (Schaffer, 2009, forthcoming). I offer reasons why grounding is not the relation that backs compositional/mechanistic explanation. I highlight how when we compositionally/mechanistically explain entity A using entities B_1-B_n we thereby show that A and B_1-B_n are not wholly distinct entities and that the mass-energy of A just is the mass-energy of B_1-B_n. The problem for grounding accounts is that they fail to accommodate such singular features of compositional explanation.

Author Information:

Carl Gillett    
Philosophy
Northern Illinois University

 

Powered by OpenConf®
Copyright©2002-2015 Zakon Group LLC