PSA2016: The 25th Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association

Full Program »

Striking the optimal balance: theoretical versus empirical methods in economics

We argue that the traditional debate concerning economic models, regarding the role of unrealistic assumptions and lack of empirical contact, is no longer fruitful. We focus on the question of how effectively models are used, rather than what they can in principle do for us. We compare the success of theoretical economic models with that of empirical, non-theoretic tools. The question becomes one of division of labor: if theoretical models can provide local explanations, understanding, or even policy prescriptions, how valuable are they compared to experiments, fieldwork, and other empirical methods?

Author Information:

Anna Alexandrova    
History and Philosophy of Science
Cambridge University

Robert Northcott    
Philosophy
Birkbeck College, University of London

 

Powered by OpenConf®
Copyright©2002-2015 Zakon Group LLC