PSA2016: The 25th Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association

Full Program »

Ethics, Uncertainty, and the Benefits of Scientific Diversity

There has been an effort to reduce “waste” in medical research. One source of waste is disagreement about scientific questions in a given domain. Consensus is sometimes encouraged to increase research efficiency. Consensus has a dark side: by reducing diversity, consensus forecloses alternative avenues of research. In this paper distinguish “uncertainty about informativeness” and “uncertainty about vindication.” We argue that waste reduction which increases consensus about informativeness is productive. But efforts to force consensus about questions of vindication are likely to be counterproductive. We close by discussing the implication these arguments have for equipoise and for informed consent.

Author Information:

Kevin Zollman    
Philosophy
Carnegie Mellon University

 

Powered by OpenConf®
Copyright©2002-2015 Zakon Group LLC